How Flash Used To Look

Back in 1997, I started using Flash 2. It was after seeing Nagafuji Kanwa’s Image Dive Studios website.

Those were the days when transparency was the big new feature in Flash 3. Wow.

I managed to snoop through age old and fortunately rarely updated download websites. I found trial versions of Flash 1, 2, 3 and 4 .

These screenshots are free to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

CC

Futurewave Presents: Futuresplash

flash1

Flash 1, or Futuresplash as it was called, was a GIF animation program for web advertisements. It also allowed you to export to an intriguing format, .SPL—a vectorized animation format that required a plugin.

Macromedia presents: Flash 2

flash2

Macromedia, then known mainly for it’s Director, SoundEdit, Fontographer, X-res (Photoshop clone) and Authorware programs, saw possibilities in Futuresplash and bought the company. Even today, www.futurewave.com redirects to Macromedia’s Flash product page.

Futuresplash, renamed Flash 2, got shortcut keys and a new logo designed by Hillman Curtis if memory serves Neville Brody (Thanks kemie)! The .SPL vectorized format was renamed .SWF, “Shockwave Flash”, and the plugin got a neat link button. Flash was truly born.

Flash 3

flash3

Flash 3 was an awesome update. Oh man. I still remember how many new possibilities I got with the new transparency feature. One of my first websites, was built in Flash 3.

Among the new features, was also Shape Tweening, Tell Target, and Aftershock, a seperate application to generate HTML code for your SWF files.

Flash also got Generator, a ridiculously pricey server-side application that would serve dynamic sound, video and text.

Flash 4

flash4

Flash 4 had mainstream hit potential. A buckload of new “Actions” were added, such as variables, object properties, and much more. The program could now be used for serious purposes, and it was a golden-age for Flash websites.

Among the features added in Flash 4, was also MP3 compression, a redesigned timeline, the ability to load data from external sources, and an annoying tabbed palette with rarely used features.

Generator also got an update, to Generator 2.

Today, Flash is version 7, or MX 2004 as they would have you call it. The “golden-age” is over, and web standards and usability seem to be in focus.

I think it all comes down to one word: purpose. Flash is great for video, animation and sound. It is not for websites… atleast not mainstream websites. It’ll be interesting to see what new features Flash 8 will have, but I think it’s future will be defined by it’s persisting purpose.

7 thoughts on “How Flash Used To Look”

  1. Daniel Pihlstr?m says:

    “It is not for websites”

    If only the rest of the world could live by those wise words. 🙂 It’s ridiculous how many people still think Flash is the revolutionizing new technology that’s going to take over the internet world as we know it. No, good old XHTML and CSS.. potentially spiced up with a js, or pretty flash header. That’s where the money is. 😀

  2. Joen says:

    I have to admit, that it’s a lesson I had to learn. In the beginning, I also developed complete flash sites, and it was indeed intriguing how snazzy a “website” one could build.

    I think the paradigm change happened somewhat simultaneously with people learning how to use the web. Suddenly Flash sites became a thing of entertainment, something one looked at, once or twice, and then forgot about… Never something one used.

    In fact, when Jakob Nielsen wrote ‘Flash is 99% bad’, it’s scary how accurate he was.

    Even WDDG seems to have learned, although their Flash sites were indeed as useful as they could be.

  3. Your first flash website reminds me a lot of gabocorp.

  4. Joen says:

    Yeh, I got that a couple of times.

    Fact is most flash sites back then looked like “that”.

    At the time, I didn’t see any big similarities though, other than big shapes moving—and that was just cos Flash was cool new and vectorbased, I guess.

    Btw, did you see the new gabocorp?

  5. kemie says:

    it wasn’t hillman curtis who did the redesign, it was neville brody

    too bad they dumped that line of design for the glossy one they have now

Comments are closed.